Thats too wierd, has anyone done the mathmatical
probabilities? Maybe the Davinci codes are real.
This was so well written it flowed like poetry,then
they blew it on the last line. Shouldn’t it have been
he was “IN” Marilyn instead of with? Too assuming?
Funny you should mention “in” instead of “with.” Snopes Urban Legends‘ version does say “in.” They also discuss the mathematical probabilities. Kind of interesting (and by interesting, I mean boring) reading.
Thats too wierd, has anyone done the mathmatical
probabilities? Maybe the Davinci codes are real.
This was so well written it flowed like poetry,then
they blew it on the last line. Shouldn’t it have been
he was “IN” Marilyn instead of with? Too assuming?
Funny you should mention “in” instead of “with.” Snopes Urban Legends‘ version does say “in.” They also discuss the mathematical probabilities. Kind of interesting (and by interesting, I mean boring) reading.